The Cloverfield Paradox


While the earthly world was on the brink of war over resources in space a team of scientists is testing a device that is able to solve the energy crisis. Several unsuccessful attempts to introduce scientists to despair. Fuel remained in three starts, and when suddenly there is a successful launch of the device, the joy does not last long — the team will have to deal with a very strange phenomena.

Director:
  • Julius Onah

Stars:
Release Date: 2018-02-04
IMDb icon 5.5/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Runtime: 1h:42m
  • Budget: $26,000,000
reviews
Constance Gregor
03 March 2018 | 02:36

If someone remember "Cloverfield, 10", there is a poster long white line coming from one of letters name, was down, as if giving the viewer to understand that the action will take place under the earth. In"the Paradox of Cloverfield" there are two lines: one goes down to the Ground, the second goes up, in Space, sending the storyline there.

"The paradox of Cloverfield" is the third film of the series, including in addition to "Cloverfield, 10" also "monster", released 10 years ago. If you place them in chronological order, then the"Paradox" is first, followed by the "Montre", and then "Cloverfield, 10". The main place of events "Paradox" is a space station "Cloverfield", equipped with a particle accelerator Shepard, capable in case of successful start begin to produce so much energy, which is enough for our planet to overcome the energy crisis. Its launch is planned in space, due to the fact that run for the ground threat for all mankind. Many attempts to produce a successful launch for the team of the astronauts not succeeded, until one day the accelerator is not did the trick.

That's only after at  the"Cloverfield" begin to happen frightening and strange events, lost touch with the Ground, which is generally lost from the field of view of the main characters. With members of the space command strange transformation, but after some time they and all begin to die one after others. Those who is still need to understand what is happening, before open itself, the shocking truth about where they were why not visible portholes Earth...

As a continuation of a series of films of the same universe, I believe that "the Paradox of Cloverfield" was quite tolerable. To as exciting, intriguing and confusing, that allowed to watch it with interest, trying to understand what is happening. So, for example, the episode with the foosball change colors of toy figures of athletes, the stage with Mine (Elizabeth Debicki), worms, crew member — Russian Volkov — all these points add to the intrigue, acting as factors compounding the situation of the characters and even more confusing them in their same reasoning. In General, the positive impression of the film was blurry because of the fact that a lot of screen time was given to the fact that is not at the station, and on the ground. In this case one would increase the duration of the film to a more comprehensive and clear to talk about the energy crisis, about the particle accelerator Shepard, about the crisis in station.

It would be nice to know a bit more about the characters themselves, because each of them — special their field Someone technician, someone doctor, someone is a physicist, somebody's engineer, somebody is a pilot. Team the story picked up international — there are German, the British American Brazilian Chinese, Russian and Irish. Stop the Director at least half of the characters more, this command would be regarded as a bunch of different national comrades, and as command.

From the point of view of the sequel of "Cloverfield" and"Cloverfield, 10" this film, produced by J. J. Abrams and directed by Julius It sheds light on where did the giant monster on our planet. Along with the "Paradox of Cloverfield" at the idea of opening trilogy, reveals the audience the theme much more than the first two films together in this case, the plot showed some SAG due to lack of time to try to grasp the immensity of the cosmos.

"The paradox of Cloverfield" how many movies on the interplanetary theme has certain similarities with a number of paintings ("Hell", "Live", the first "Stranger", "Through the horizon") at the part of what fate awaits the crew. In General, when all the action happens in the walls of the spacecraft to come up with something more ambitious or epic hard, just have to run on compartments to shout in all throat. In a whole movie left a good impression. Today is not so many films are shot on the space theme, the more about survival crisis situations (from a recent — "Live" with Reynolds Gyllenhaal), so fans of the fantastic genre of the "Paradox of Cloverfield" may appeal. At least to learn more about the universe, including "Cloverfield", to see this movie.

However, to watch You. Your opinion is not impose.

Nice view.

7 of 10

Fifi Madonia
24 February 2018 | 04:21

Film series Cloverfield got the third account picture, and like me, do not strikes face. Not understand how there are such a number of negative reviews and so little positive. Seeing this ratio, much surprised. Why not enough to these people? Although it may be due to me. For me, that in contrast most watched, absolutely not like the first film of the series under the name Cloverfield. In many ways, of course, because I hate the mocumentary style himself by itself. Don't deserve it this kind of attention and increased interest in your time. Remember that was disappointed after viewing. In General about this series, my opinion goes to split the majority opinion, and quite dramatically. Only in respect of Cloverfield 10 most agree. A tense, intimate Thriller with great actors and a pretty absurd and simultaneously cool ending, tearing templates, it was very tasty.

What I respect that range is for what each film on the moment differs from the other two radical and so that is not immediately clear that they are linked. Since that they are shot in totally different genres, continuing the fact that all different characters, scene, time, story and etc. From each film is not know about what it will, here is a big plus.

The new film takes the place of action in space, almost all events on the space station. This unexpectedly as well, I love movies about space. But still there are parallel dimensions, temporal paradoxes that is very fascinated.

This picture does not only expands the universe, but and something transpires in it(it would be time already), and also binds to all three tapes among themselves, some of the details, even not very noticeable and may be a little far-fetched.

Yes, here so the same lack of strange events, on first glance, seemingly delusional, which does not specifically explains, is a common cause of what is happening, so that the station can happen all anyone, with anyone. Sounds about right to me. To the same this is a plus the unpredictability of the painting. And the degree of tension is quite high.

And from the ending, I truly love it. First, such a giant I can not ever, second, it is one of scenes linking the whole series.

In General, the film is decent, despite some screenwriting flaws, and unlike previous, acquired a variety of a cliche, but the he interesting, intense, unpredictable. The fourth film have to wait long.

7 of 10

Melody Pincas
06 February 2018 | 07:31

The main place of action — space station complex design resembling a clever combination of spinners. A group of scientists is going to run a complex thing like a nuclear power plant or something like that is installed on the station is able to provide electricity to the entire planet so, help avoid the looming at the Earth military conflict. On Land this time the energy crisis with all the consequences in the form of threats of disruption electricity, queues, and so on — all brutalized in General.

Selection of astronauts like to joke, so as a team presented by the Americans, Russian, German, Chinese and Chris O Dowd, who here jokes like this is a spin-off of IT crowd. Russian for the names of the wolves as expected Russian, accuses the German militarism, but well does not drink vodka, do not goes to hat in General, it seems, knows about the operation of the station more than any other. As every Russian, from him, of course, is dolls. Russian plays, if not mistaken, the Norwegian. There are still a few characters, but does not importantly, could be more or less without any loss. scenario.

As usual, things don't go and it's "wrong" places starts reminds me of sci-Fi horror movie like "Through the horizon" or quite sickening episodes of "Alien", then the Comedy, the game Soma General — nothing is clear. Sometimes the film is so keen that difficult to recall the absurd the first in a series of "Black mirror" new season now in the hands of Netflix, perhaps in the was also some kind of subtle message, not know.

More about plot the script to say nothing all, as will be a solid spoiler, but one thing is for sure — the movie is interesting, exciting, but some ridiculous. If the first part, definitely — achievement, the second part — just a great branch, then the third tries to explain almost not all the series, loudly declaring, in what's it but this explanation is somewhat naive and clumsy. Plus the explanation misses several important aspects of the series (not to mention about your own story), becoming places in the mutterings of a madman. The feeling of broken attraction appears to the middle, the film starts to spin, circling the head, and half of the film, almost like in the Land, it runs out of electricity and you have sit confused. In General, the manipulation of pace and genre here, not working in the end, a strong feeling that "something went wrong so" there is not only plot scenario and was intended by the authors, but and film that whole unlikely expected.

The rapid emergence of The Paradox Cloverfield, with the announcement less than a day before the release Neflix, adivised not less than the appearance of a monster in new York surprised the heroes of the first part. The suddenness of the announcement and the release, perhaps, played the film a good service — didn't have any expectations, so in General the feeling is quite positive. But, honestly, as a fan of the series, say — if this movie is not was removed under the label Cloverfield, it would be better and so the film swings on a fairly serious level and don't it.

Overall, again, the film does not cause rejection, but if not in Cloverfield name is it was very average, although not a bad space Thriller about base, astronauts and "something went not so".

faq
How long is The Cloverfield Paradox?
2h 22m
How much did it cost to make The Cloverfield Paradox?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $26,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie The Cloverfield Paradox?
This tv-show was directed by Julius Onah.
What is the genre of The Cloverfield Paradox?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Sci-Fi, Horror, Mystery, Best Thriller Movies 2017, Best Horror Movies 2018, Best Mystery Movies 2018.
Who starred in The Cloverfield Paradox?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Gugu Mbatha-Raw, David Oyelowo, Daniel Brühl, John Ortiz, Chris O'Dowd.
What is The Cloverfield Paradox IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 5.5.
When was The Cloverfield Paradox released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2018-02-04.