Dunkirk

As a result of viewing this tape so I want to talk about brilliance, showiness and originality. Nolan is doing something that do not remove its closest competitors. Instead of sentimental paintings Spielberg on the war we get cold the reenactment of the battle. Instead of pouzitelnosti offered by Oliver stone — dry facts. To modern audiences it may seem that Nolan is a true genius — came up with a new concept, the film in which there is the basic plot lines of many conversations. No and the person of the protagonist. Only war and person.

In such presentation the work of Nolan's admittedly brilliant. Such, it looks for most of the movie fans of the younger generation. But that if you look with a different angle?

You can easily find similar the concept of war. In memory comes "the longest day", "is the Paris?" "Bridge too far". These pictures were created in a different era and using quite different technical means. But certainly the idea of Nolan new.

A bit intrigued by the topic, I was discouraged. It turns out my favorite "Weekend in Zuydcoote" Henri Verney was shot time about Dunkirk. Comparing these tapes I fully defined in against the work of Nolan. She is not enough warmth, sincerity and realism. Selected angles in more like a computer game, and characters — soldier is similar to the characters in this game. If True shows us hordes of discouraged people, Nolan is in full compliance with the traditions of the genre. He tells us the heroic story, spotting his it only fragments of unbecoming episodes.

Cold aesthetics of Nolan battles more valid for the fantastic strips. Select the views most cases simply impossible for the eyewitnesses of the events. But here Verney all much easier. But each frame seems imbued with smoke that is inhaled witnesses the drama. These two realities is not relate.

So, for the film is Nolan, I can't be solely enthusiastic. But can't  do all references "secondary" and arguments lack of correctness in the choice of the chosen aesthetics. Therefore, it is the film is ambiguous. Specifically, for quite fresh in a good cinematic decision 2017, this was an outstanding event. A specific assessment, the case of the third order. Now, today I put

7 of 10

Love Christopher Nolan for the ability to make a real shooter out of the trailer, the most you I assure you before view of the film is just not can be bad! And it's true. Each of his work - another reason to have a good time. Still cool, when the Director has a good money by marketing promotion and growing need a place hands!

However, the film was not so bright, compassionate and humane, as it seemed to me to view, but still. the Film is worthy of a solid eight. Because dozens I put only your most favorite movies (strange somehow, right?), from I can not take my eyes, look in zahleb, and a few hours later ready to re-examine, to go through the emotions same delight. And why not nine, so because film the middle was not quite the whole, so as a parallel narrative, i.e., multiple storylines in some point began somewhere logical and somewhere even not clear. The people sitting with me the auditorium was whispering, asking each friend "what happened?" "why did he got there?", "what is this means." So that is my complaint and don't do it, please, the main theme of my reviews, so as then I will only write about the merits of the film.

1. Very pleased that this time Christopher Nolan took young and little-known actors who could fulfill the role, if only in cheap movies and TV shows. What well, thanks for the new "Discovery", and for Finn Whitehead (now so will definitely be a sea of fans) Tom Glynn-Carney, because they are easily surpassed, is well known for young people Harry Styles (it somehow all the attention is not paying, at least in passing, and remember some clips 1D). Oh, and its role is nothing I can say the bad, so that this time I have been without dislike the stars, who climb into a cinema).

2. Multiple storylines. With the beginning, you see story number 1, number 2 and number 3, which in the future will strongly intertwine, connect, and to keep the viewer in the intense interest!

3. A separate paragraph deserves the heavenly imagery of the aircraft. I still no never seen that they looked it is easy - all their movements were incredibly smooth and clear. Operator - you a genius (theHoyt van Huitema)! The feeling that a glide plane moves the same planning camera. Only she is moving along other lines. It is definitely a brilliant find and operator job!

4. Music. For me this one major components in any film. But as I can estimate it as professional, always rely on feelings, I have to say - she made me cry, to be afraid, in General, STRONGLY to SUFFER and to worry about what is happening. Thanks to Hans Zimmer for all the lumps in the throat, what the soul heard the silence is deafening!

5. And lastly, it what initially seemed error, it was heavy screenwriting and directorial work (Ah, the brilliant Christopher Nolan!). How you have to think about the film below in the beginning it clearly featured the main character, and finally just disappeared. After all, the main here is humanity itself, the people themselves, who share a common trouble on a global scale. And it's true, always when the person gets in this situation, he loses his identity, becoming shared with other people, becoming a single entity, the name what HUMANITY is.

8 from 10

I admit that early stuffed to the eyeballs with information on the second world war, I no idea had that was in the time of the Dunkirk operations. First saw the title future project of Christopher Nolan, I I found it interesting enough for regular fantastic pictures or film adaptation of the comic book...

The big surprise was the news about that Dunkerque — it's a military drama, historical film. Well, what it was not a victorious attack, and in fact, the flight with the mainland has caused some confusion and interest.

Nolan chose not enough unambiguous risky, on my opinion, a commercial point of view the project but from the point of view of creative and purely human, all obviously absolutely clear. Work on Dunkerque, looks like an irresistible desire of the author to change the vector to work on something completely new over than others.

Dunkirk evacuation, according to Kolanowski verified and very well designed picture. On a war is kind the course of the film and this phrase can describe almost anything. going on the screen. Only a few grams of romanticizing events, but where that in contemporary film and in other respects a cruel and relentlessly fight for life, the struggle for oxygen lungs.

In the air, on land and in the sea confrontation, faceless crowd, a human sea, running from the inevitable death. But death is everywhere, it has infiltrated all around it is not to hide, she near and only stubborn lucky people will be selected from the hell alive.

Thank you for that survived. Here what, at times, is a feat.

Dunkirk — is movie under the brand of Christopher Nolan. The picture is quite specific and, as a rule, this kind of cinema, according to really interesting not so also a large circle of spectators. In any case, the Dunkirk deserves attention as all the last wizard.