Maze Runner: The Death Cure


Thomas leads the squad surviving Gleizerov to fulfill the last and most dangerous mission. For the sake of their friends, they need to get into the legendary Last city, fatal labyrinth, controlled by Vice. Everyone who lives there, will finally get the answers to all the questions which tormented Gleizerov since entering the maze.

Director:
  • Wes Ball

Stars:
Release Date: 2018-01-26
IMDb icon 6.2/10
  • Country: US
  • Language: English
  • Runtime: 2h:21m
  • Budget: $62,000,000
  • Revenue: Cumulative Worldwide $108,116,349, 28 January 2018
reviews
Tabitha Coats
31 January 2018 | 03:10

Post-apocalyptic teen novels of James Dashner of the cycle "Running in the maze" has been bought for film adaptation. Due to the fact that the first "Running in the maze" was removed only for 34 million dollars, his fees 348 million dollars was more than enough to the filming of the second picture — twice more expensive "Running in the maze: the test of fire." This feed investors too, not failed, having collected in world hire 312 and Fox invested third and final series of the epic "Running in the labyrinth: a Cure for death."

Books are not read and film the first part sucked and unlike other franchise — for male adolescents finally and the relationship between the three parts makes it a whole trilogy.

The budget is the culmination of the cycle accounted for 83 million, and these funds were in large measure wasted on the abundant special effects and many action scenes. Went to the past the intimacy of the first "Running in the maze" — in "the Cure death" of the characters at first penetrate in a futuristic metropolis, and then take it by storm, opening a passage for the army of the armed disadvantaged, which "Vice" is not considers worthy of protection and salvation.

Yes, investors took their interest twice.

I am sure that at about Director this part will be Wes ball, hardly someone had doubts. The guy he according to the Director's standards, is very young, he 37 years and exactly this trilogy he already made a name for himself and solid income. I am sure that he had once will delight us with his work.

I watched this film is in 3D, so it is just left in love graphics. Even in those places when they don't happen — pleasing even the usual the surrounding landscape, whether it is the countryside or a beautiful city, especially at night. Well and about a variety of tricks, jumping, flying with Windows I do not say anything — I had feeling that all going from me. Immediately obvious, where did the proceeds from the last two parts — the graphics are just amazing.

The result: a solidly made, visually beautiful film, a lot of sturdily built dynamic action scenes. It is seen that the creators have tried and the film has matured with children. In anticipation of the Panthers can be fun, good movie that boasts — positive feedback was provided.

8 from 10

Bryn Giesser
30 January 2018 | 07:17

Looking spontaneously the first part of the trilogy four years ago, I never thought the latest look as much as twice one the first week.

"Epic. A large-scale. Powerfully." — these word came in mind after watching this films, but the third part was not so vain as the my opinion.

Effects there's definitely failed. Looks realistic, unosawa. In some time you are immersed in them it's not know which realities you really exist.

Plot, as for me, a good may not so fresh, but definitely interesting.

There have been embarrassing moments when everything is hand the main characters and the enemies just stand and watching they get their way, sometimes the thought creeps in: "in life they already in the third minute of lost". However, it and film.

Relationships between the characters are so is on level, a sense of some unity, owe each other support. These guys, even in the biggest trouble go together.

Ending not left with mixed feelings, but left a lot of questions for yourself, but not will spoil.

Actors chosen well, look at them think the other to be here and can.

Can something to understand the feelings of those who first read the trilogy, and only after I watched the movie. Yes, the differences with the book can be annoying, but in this case it is better to try to ignore the read and consider the film as individual work. My friend that I read the books long before the movie, and might have treated the film with skepticism, this tape is like, though confused by some differences.

Some moments are touching, some funny, from some of breath. Let's just say, a little bit of everything.

the film look no need to it your, for someone it at all. As for me, the main idea of this phrase, uttered by one of the characters: "You can save everyone". But as said in response, you can at least try.

I liked that the film does not about the romantic part of life and such feelings are not in the foreground, even though they are. More about movie the struggle, unity, and friendship.

Whether me, I went for the third time. And think I wouldn't regret it.

And like they say, not stop.

Of 9 10

Sarette Wini
26 January 2018 | 01:08

Perhaps, it is unlikely somebody is going to watch this film if the previous parts, the story does not hooked. Someone who likes dystopia, someone is a fan of the literary source, someone close to teenage adventures. I with the original not familiar, compare to me not , but I noticed this trilogy attention because of the themes and the cast.

Thus, the name "Running in the maze" left here now in name only and as references, the action will unfold in many places. Plenty of action — do have sure. It already served from the very first minute, so I stress is created. It's just that... claims to the script every ten minutes of screen time occurs all more more. Many illogical actions, when you sit and think, "Well, where? Well here why?" For example, was struck by the fact that of large crowds of people in the main thing is have a corrupt hero, even without the serum — a potential bomb for other obvious "hole" in if the critical moment he will become worse. Who needs such a sacrifice and anyone what had to convince? The most incredible epic fail (in all senses) was in the scene with the bus. Have me with only one emotion was: "are you kidding me?!" According to laugh in hall this is quite a dramatic episode, not I have one has the impression that the creators of make we are complete idiots.

About the indestructibility of the heroes at the time of the shootings and the scenes life in as they are all enemies to stack bundles, I even not saying — well, such are the laws of the genre, has to write off.

Was disappointed that same Thomas, who in the first two parts were inspiration revolutionary, led of people for themselves, this part somehow got lost and moved the background.

Acting ensemble I love, only here it's a shame that though Dylan O'brien, who just was magnificent in the image of Stiles in Teen Wolf that Kaya Scodelario, so good, failed to disclose ambiguous character Effy Stonem in Skins here in fact there was nothing to play. Although the dramatic moments were, and they were. Aidan Gillen here continued to play the little finger of the Game of Thrones, but he really left to do — the character is poorly written, a slimy villain that there, that there.

This film is also, on my opinion, is not very small enough humor. There is a dramatic moment where she said a couple of jokes, and they just very well lightened the atmosphere, being at the business. It would be possible to make them a little bit more, because some moments of pathos gets so much of this becomes saccharine. Especially when you consider that same O'brien great comic actor, just a crime was not give it a couple of humorous remarks, he would it (this applies to all of the trilogy).

Of the benefits have the film — liked the Russian voice. I usually difficult to stand the duplicate pictures, I prefer the original with subtitles, but here and voice is well picked up, and the dubbing actors to have played well. Even the voice actress, voicing Teresa, I was a more than a voice Scodelario, which is pretty rough in real life.

In General, if you want to have a look at a beautiful picture in 3D action scenes and know what the outcome of the case, then Yes, go on the view is worth.

5 from 10

faq
How long is Maze Runner: The Death Cure?
3h 41m
How much has Maze Runner: The Death Cure made?
Commercial tv-show fees worldwide today are Cumulative Worldwide $108,116,349, 28 January 2018.
How much did it cost to make Maze Runner: The Death Cure?
According to various sources, the cost of producing the tv-show was at least $62,000,000.
Who is the director of the movie Maze Runner: The Death Cure?
This tv-show was directed by Wes Ball.
What is the genre of Maze Runner: The Death Cure?
The tv-show belongs to the genres of Action, Sci-Fi, Thriller, Fantasy, Best Action Movies 2018, Best Adventure Movies 2018, Best Fantasy Movies 2018, Best Sci-Fi Movies 2018, Best Thriller Movies 2018.
Who starred in Maze Runner: The Death Cure?
Many famous actors starred in this tv-show, here are the names of the most famous: Dylan O'Brien, Ki Hong Lee, Kaya Scodelario, Thomas Brodie-Sangster, Dexter Darden.
What is Maze Runner: The Death Cure IMDB Ranking?
At the moment, the rating is 6.2.
When was Maze Runner: The Death Cure released?
The start date for this tv-show on USA TV is 2018-01-26.